Current:Home > NewsSouth Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech -Finovate
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
View
Date:2025-04-12 15:41:58
SEOUL, Dec 12 - South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol's switch from contrition to defiance on Thursday (Dec 11) over his martial law order rallied some supporters but other members of his party said it did nothing to sway their view that he must be removed from office.
In a speech before a second impeachment vote scheduled for Saturday, Yoon condemned his political opponents as "anti-state forces" that side with enemies in North Korea, said Pyongyang may have hacked the South's elections and defended last week's short-lived martial law order as a legal move to protect democracy.
The remarks hit many of the talking points featuring on conservative YouTube channels and marked a sharp change of tone from a speech before the first impeachment vote last week in which he apologised and said he would place his political future in the hands of his People Power Party.
It was unclear what caused the change but Yoon gave no sign of supporting a proposal by PPP leader Han Dong-hoon for him to resign in coming months and to hand authority to the prime minister and ruling party until then.
The speech brought to the fore divisions in the PPP. Changing tack, Han urged party members to vote for impeachment on Saturday, a move greeted by shouting from pro-Yoon lawmakers, who voted in Kweon Seong-dong as their new party floor leader shortly after Yoon's speech.
[[nid:712402]]
Kweon, a Yoon supporter, said the party's position was still to oppose the president's impeachment but that a meeting would be held before Saturday's vote to finalise plans.
The party boycotted the last vote, preventing a quorum. At least 200 votes are needed to impeach Yoon. Opposition parties have 192 seats, so they need at least eight PPP members to join.
As of Thursday, at least seven members of the party were expected to support a new impeachment motion.
One PPP lawmaker who said he would now vote to impeach Yoon said the president's new remarks may have rallied some loyalists but sowed more confusion and division among conservatives.
[[nid:712337]]
"His speech had an impact on the election of the floor leader. Also, it sounds like he urged those who blindly follow the president among conservatives to take action," PPP lawmaker Kim Sang-wook told reporters.
Kim said he felt frustrated and betrayed because the speech dashed his last hopes that Yoon would leave office in a "decent" way.
Public support for impeachment
Opinion polls show a majority of South Koreans support impeaching Yoon. A survey released by pollster Realmeter on Dec. 5 found 73.6 per cent of respondents supported impeachment, including 50.4 per cent of those who identified themselves as conservatives.
Yoon's speech lit up conservative political forums online, with the top-ranked posts titled "Martial law was the most reasonable decision", and "Han made a wrong decision".
After Yoon's speech, scuffles could be seen breaking out between attendees of a pro-conservative rally in central Seoul and an opposition supporter who removed a banner of support for Yoon's martial law declaration.
Kim Tae-hyun, who attended the rally, said he thought Yoon did a "good job" with his speech and had the right to declare martial law.
"And the impeachment just shouldn't happen... So (the martial law declaration) was merely an expression of the authority of the president," said Kim. "The Democratic Party, which is currently holding the country back, is the real issue."
[[nid:712404]]
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (667)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- From Snapchat to YouTube, here's how to monitor and protect your kids online
- Taylor Swift Reunites With Pregnant Brittany Mahomes in Sweet Moment at Chiefs Game
- Biden sets a 10-year deadline for US cities to replace lead pipes and make drinking water safer
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Taylor Swift surpasses fellow pop star to become richest female musician
- Browns QB Deshaun Watson has settled sexual assault lawsuit, attorney says
- LeBron James, Lakers look highly amused as fan is forcibly removed from arena
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- California home made from wine barrels, 'rustic charm' hits market: See inside
Ranking
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- 'Completely out of line': Malachi Moore apologizes for outburst in Alabama-Vanderbilt game
- Megan Thee Stallion's New Look Has the Internet Thirsting
- En Honduras, los Libertarios y las Demandas Judiciales Podrían Quebrar el País
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Reese Witherspoon Reveals Where Big Little Lies Season 3 Really Stands
- Toyota pushes back EV production plans in America
- Federal judge orders Google to open its Android app store to competition
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
NFL Week 5 winners, losers: What's wrong with floundering 49ers?
Will Taylor Swift be at the Kansas City game against the New Orleans Saints?
Travis Kelce's New '90s Hair at Kansas City Chiefs Game Has the Internet Divided
In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
Supreme Court to hear challenge to ghost-gun regulation
Opinion: Messi doesn't deserve MVP of MLS? Why arguments against him are weak
Why Lisa Marie Presley Kept Son Benjamin Keough's Body on Dry Ice for 2 Months After His Death